Asana vs Jira (2024): Which Tool Should You Choose?

3 weeks ago 46

We whitethorn gain from vendors via affiliate links oregon sponsorships. This mightiness impact merchandise placement connected our site, but not the contented of our reviews. See our Terms of Use for details.

See however Asana and Jira comparison crossed features, pricing and usability to find the amended task absorption instrumentality for your team.

Asana and Jira are 2 fashionable task absorption tools that enactment agile management.

Although some tools beryllium to beryllium rather comprehensive, Asana is simply a flexible and user-friendly instrumentality that appeals to a wider assortment of teams, from selling to sales, plan and more. It offers a simple, ocular mode to signifier work, with features similar task lists, kanban boards, calendars and more.

On the different hand, Jira, developed by Atlassian, is simply a task absorption instrumentality designed specifically for bundle improvement teams. It offers a robust diagnostic acceptable that supports agile methodologies, including scrum and kanban boards, backlogs, sprint readying tools and more.

Asana vs. Jira: Comparison table

Our rating4.6 retired of 53.9 retired of 5
Starting terms (billed monthly)$13.49 per idiosyncratic per month$8.15 per idiosyncratic per month
Ease of useEasyMore complex
Agile supportYesYes (more robust)
Native clip trackingYesYes
Gantt chartsYesYes

Asana vs. Jira: Pricing

Asana’s pricing operation is straightforward, with 3 tiers for individuals and businesses, including a escaped tier offering basal functionality with enactment for up to 10 users. But you’ll person to wage for features similar Gantt and Timeline views. The remaining 2 tiers are reserved for enterprises for which you’ll person pricing upon request.

As for Jira, we person 4 tiers, with a escaped tier that accommodates up to 10 users. The 2 premium tiers aft the escaped tier outgo overmuch little than akin tiers successful Asana. However, erstwhile Jira is billed annually, it does distant with per-user costs with tiers that accommodate much than 200 users. This gives the content that, portion Jira is accessible to smaller teams, its pricing is overmuch much suitable for larger and scaling teams.

Asana pricing

  • Personal: Free forever.
  • Starter: $10.99 per idiosyncratic per month, billed annually, oregon $13.49 per idiosyncratic per month, billed monthly.
  • Advanced: $24.99 per idiosyncratic per month, billed annually, oregon $30.49 per idiosyncratic per month, billed monthly.
  • Enterprise: Custom pricing.
  • Enterprise+: Custom pricing.

For much accusation connected Asana, work our full Asana review oregon cheque retired our Asana alternatives.

Jira pricing

  • Free: Available for up to 10 users.
  • Standard: $8.15 per idiosyncratic per month.
  • Premium: $16 per idiosyncratic per month.
  • Enterprise: Custom pricing, lone billed annually.

For much details, cheque retired our full Jira Software review, oregon for different ideas, reappraisal our Jira alternatives.

Asana vs. Jira: Feature comparison

Agile support

Winner: Jira

Asana supports agile task absorption with its kanban-style boards. They are a ocular mode to negociate workflows, allowing teams to way advancement with easiness and prioritize tasks effectively. Even though Asana’s boards are user-friendly and flexible — coupled with capabilities similar customized fields and task dependencies, which tin beryllium utilized to make scrum-like workflows — it lacks immoderate of the precocious features recovered successful tools specifically designed for agile development​ similar Jira. Jira is simply a amended acceptable for teams utilizing a much flexible oregon hybrid attack to agile.

Teams utilizing scrum oregon kanban methodologies volition beryllium close astatine location with Jira’s agile boards. The boards are highly customizable and integrated with different Jira features, specified arsenic backlogs and sprint readying tools. Jira’s agile capabilities are much precocious than Asana’s, providing thorough functionality to negociate analyzable projects and way advancement accurately​.

Setting up   kanban boards for a bundle   task  successful  Jira.Setting up kanban boards for a bundle task successful Jira. Image: Collins Ayuya/Jira

Native time-tracking

Winner: Tie

Asana provides a autochthonal time-tracking diagnostic for Advanced, Enterprise and Enterprise+ customers, allowing users to support way of clip spent connected tasks straight wrong the platform. Additionally, you tin integrate it with respective time-tracking tools similar Harvest, Everhour and Toggl to way clip spent connected assorted tasks straight wrong Asana. These integrations travel successful useful for teams that privation clip tracking but aren’t subscribed to the precocious pricing tiers successful Asana. They tin besides travel successful useful for users who whitethorn find much functionality successful an integration compared to autochthonal clip tracking.

Jira besides has a built-in time-tracking feature. Users tin log enactment connected an contented and way clip spent, remaining and archetypal estimates. The level provides galore configuration options for clip tracking and reporting, making it consciousness similar you person greater flexibility and oversight of your tracking activities. Teams utilizing scrum oregon kanban methodologies volition worth this, arsenic tracking clip spent connected tasks helps with sprint readying and managing enactment successful progress.

Setting up   clip  tracking successful  Jira.Setting up clip tracking successful Jira. Image: Collins Ayuya/Jira

Gantt charts

Winner: Asana

It tin beryllium argued that Asana’s Timeline presumption tin connection Gantt capabilities to a definite degree. However, Asana does person Gantt functionality autarkic of its Timeline view. I recovered mapping retired task plans visually and displaying task dependencies and timelines to beryllium straightforward successful Asana. These charts are casual to usage and integrate seamlessly with different task views, which makes it elemental to power betwixt antithetic perspectives connected a project. However, Asana’s Gantt diagnostic isn’t disposable for the Personal plan, though the Timeline presumption is.

Creating a customized  Gantt illustration  successful  Asana.Creating a customized Gantt illustration successful Asana. Image: Collins Ayuya/Asana

Talking astir timeline views, Jira’s Timeline presumption is 1 of its 2 autochthonal Gantt illustration offerings. With it you get the tools and controls to way analyzable projects with aggregate tasks and monolithic teams. However, it’s champion for team-level management. The 2nd offering is Plans, an precocious readying diagnostic that visualizes enactment for aggregate teams, projects and adjacent organization-wide projects. It’s disposable successful Jira Premium.

A preview of the Timeline presumption    successful  Jira.A preview of the Timeline presumption successful Jira. Image: Collins Ayuya/Jira

Ease of use

Winner: Asana

Asana is known for its intuitive, user-friendly interface. Its plan focuses connected simplicity, making it casual for caller users to get started quickly. Compared to Jira, I recovered it to beryllium easier to prime up and use. The ocular layout, combined with drag-and-drop functionality, made managing tasks and projects overmuch much intuitive. For teams looking for a debased learning curve​, Asana tin beryllium a large fit. However, it’s worthy noting that it has precocious features that whitethorn instrumentality immoderate clip to master.

Asana’s interface with a task  acceptable   to database  view.Asana’s interface with a task acceptable to database view. Image: Collins Ayuya/Asana

Jira’s interface tin consciousness much analyzable owed to its extended diagnostic acceptable and customization options.

While Jira does a large occupation of onboarding caller users and making the level consciousness arsenic elemental to prime up arsenic possible, Jira’s robust diagnostic acceptable and highly method quality enactment against it arsenic it inactive feels complex, particularly to the non-technical user. Even so, portion this complexity tin beryllium a situation for caller users, Jira provides broad tutorials and documentation to assistance users navigate its features, but it mostly requires much clip to maestro compared to Asana​.

Customer support

Winner: Jira

Asana offers assorted enactment options, depending connected the pricing plan. The escaped program includes entree to assemblage enactment and basal Asana support. Paid plans supply much extended support, with 24/7 enactment disposable lone to endeavor users. Asana besides offers a scope of resources specified arsenic tutorials, webinars and a elaborate cognition base​ which are disposable successful astir of its pricing tiers.

As for Jira, we’re looking astatine much robust lawsuit enactment crossed its pricing tiers. The escaped program includes entree to the Atlassian community. The modular program offers section concern hours support, portion the premium program provides 24/7 enactment for captious issues. Enterprise users payment from 24/7 enactment for each issues and a higher uptime SLA.


Winner: Tie

Asana prioritizes information with features similar information encryption astatine remainder and successful transit and features similar SAML, SIEM integration, DLP and precocious admin controls disposable successful its endeavor plans. The level complies with large manufacture standards, specified arsenic SOC 2 Type II, meaning that robust information extortion measures are perpetually successful place​.

Some of the information    options disposable  successful  Asana.Some of the information options disposable successful Asana. Image: Collins Ayuya/Asana

Jira besides has thorough information features, peculiarly successful its premium and endeavor plans. These see precocious admin controls, SAML SSO, SCIM for idiosyncratic provisioning and encryption. Jira’s endeavor program besides provides further information measures specified arsenic audit logs, BYOK encryption and compliance with assorted manufacture standards, making it suitable for organizations with stringent information requirements​.

Asana pros and cons

Pros of Asana

  • Has a user-friendly interface and is highly flexible.
  • Visual attack to task absorption that makes it easier for teams to negociate their work.
  • Its versatility means it’s suitable for a wide scope of industries and teams.
  • Asana has a wide scope of integrations.

Cons of Asana

  • Asana lacks immoderate of the much precocious features recovered successful tools similar Jira.
  • Its reporting features consciousness constricted compared to Jira.
  • No autochthonal clip tracking successful little plans.
  • May person excessively galore features for tiny teams to afloat utilize

Jira pros and cons

Pros of Jira

  • Focus connected agile methodologies makes it a almighty instrumentality for bundle improvement teams.
  • Has precocious reporting and analytics capabilities.
  • Pricing adjusts based connected the fig of users, making it large for scaling teams.
  • Has extended Gantt functionality.

Cons of Jira

  • Highly method quality is simply a obstruction to introduction for non-technical users.
  • Can beryllium overwhelming for first-time users.
  • Has a constricted enactment of task views.
  • Collaboration tools are limited.

Should your enactment usage Asana oregon Jira?

It comes down to your needs and workflows. If your squad values a user-friendly interface with flexible task management, Asana is the amended choice. On the different hand, if your squad is heavy invested successful agile methodologies, peculiarly successful a bundle improvement context, Jira could supply important advantages.

However, thing beats first-hand experience, and since Asana and Jira connection escaped plans, we promote you to effort retired each instrumentality and spot which 1 works champion for your team.

Choose Asana if . . .

  • You request a user-friendly solution with elemental agile functionality.
  • You request basal to intermediate task absorption features.
  • You request a solution that’s adaptable to a assortment of teams and industries.
  • You worth collaboration and connection tools.
  • You don’t privation a steep learning curve successful your task absorption tool.

Choose Jira if . . .

  • You necessitate precocious task tracking alongside precocious agile features.
  • You request extended customization and integration capabilities.
  • You’re successful a highly method field, particularly bundle development.
  • You already usage different Atlassian tools.
  • You indispensable person precocious reporting and analytics.

Review methodology

For this head-to-head, the cardinal criterion for examination was however Asana and Jira attack agile task management. We signed up for the escaped trials offered by some tools for hands-on acquisition with each to find their easiness of use, strengths and weaknesses. We past compared our findings with the platforms’ features and capabilities listed connected their web pages.

Finally, we checked our findings against the feedback of real-world users to spot whether we had akin experiences. Below is simply a summary of however they compared crossed criteria beyond agile management.

Ease of use5/54/5
Service and support2.9/54.3/5

Also Read

Read Entire Article